One of the readers of this blog asked a question of how come a camera phone lens is much smaller then a traditional camera.
So I decided to post this question to Dr. Mustafa Abushagur who is the Director Microsystems Engineering at RIT. He has been working in the field of optics for 25yrs and is a Fellow of OSA and SPIE. So here is what he had to say about this question:
The aperture size and focal length of the lens plays a role
in the quality of the image to be captured. Camera lenses are usually
identified by their f/number (f/#). The f/# is defined as the ratio of the
focal length to the diameter of the aperture. In single-lens
reflex (SLR) camera the aperture size (entrance pupil) can be adjusted to
change the f/number providing more flexibility to the photographer in capturing
the image. Changing the f/number controls the amount of light falling on the
imager and allows for creating the proper lighting condition. Changing the f/#
also changes the depth of the field (the range at which the image will be
focused on the imager). The smaller the f/number the larger range of depth of
field. The f/# for SLR lenses ranges from f/1 to f/128 or larger. The smaller
the f/#, the faster the lens and the more expensive it will be. Smaller f/#
requires extensive corrections for the aberration (deviation from sharp image).
Good quality images vary with f/number of the lens. It is found that f/numbers
between f/5.6 and f/8 gives best quality images for most typical applications.
Cell phone cameras have a fixed f/number which limits the imaging conditions
that will be available to the photographer. This affects the lighting condition
and ultimately the quality of the images taken by cell phone cameras. Cell
phone cameras by their compact nature have very small aperture stops and focal
lengths. Also their aperture stop is fixed. As an example Nokia 6600 cell phone
has a camera with 3.5 mm focal length and f/2.8 which results in an aperture
with 1.25 mm diameter. This f/number does not give large depth of field so only
few subject will be sharp in the image. This is very clear in the image shown
here.
I would like to thank Dr. Abushagur for taking the time to answer this question. Some thing I wanted to note about the image he included here on the left is about its depth of field. If you notice some of the flowers are in focus and others are out of focus. This is a great example of depth of field and how in current camera phones it is limited and creates images similar to this. In future posts I will cover more on this topic.
The 640x480 image is decent for a snapshot. It definitely shows the depth of field limitations, but there is only so much focal length after all.
Posted by: geographer47 | November 06, 2006 at 09:06 AM
Hi, I would like to hear your expert opinion about Omnivision's proposed Wavefront Coding camera lenses. Have you heard anything about this and do you think it will work for camera phones? What are the benefits and drawbacks?
Thank you very much.
Posted by: Babu | November 09, 2006 at 05:48 AM
Nice article. Even such photo dummy like me understood the idea!
Posted by: Alex | September 28, 2007 at 09:48 AM