One of the readers of this blog asked a question of how come a camera phone lens is much smaller then a traditional camera.
So I decided to post this question to Dr. Mustafa Abushagur who is the Director Microsystems Engineering at RIT. He has been working in the field of optics for 25yrs and is a Fellow of OSA and SPIE. So here is what he had to say about this question:
The aperture size and focal length of the lens plays a role
in the quality of the image to be captured. Camera lenses are usually
identified by their f/number (f/#). The f/# is defined as the ratio of the
focal length to the diameter of the aperture. In single-lens
reflex (SLR) camera the aperture size (entrance pupil) can be adjusted to
change the f/number providing more flexibility to the photographer in capturing
the image. Changing the f/number controls the amount of light falling on the
imager and allows for creating the proper lighting condition. Changing the f/#
also changes the depth of the field (the range at which the image will be
focused on the imager). The smaller the f/number the larger range of depth of
field. The f/# for SLR lenses ranges from f/1 to f/128 or larger. The smaller
the f/#, the faster the lens and the more expensive it will be. Smaller f/#
requires extensive corrections for the aberration (deviation from sharp image).
Good quality images vary with f/number of the lens. It is found that f/numbers
between f/5.6 and f/8 gives best quality images for most typical applications.
Cell phone cameras have a fixed f/number which limits the imaging conditions
that will be available to the photographer. This affects the lighting condition
and ultimately the quality of the images taken by cell phone cameras. Cell
phone cameras by their compact nature have very small aperture stops and focal
lengths. Also their aperture stop is fixed. As an example Nokia 6600 cell phone
has a camera with 3.5 mm focal length and f/2.8 which results in an aperture
with 1.25 mm diameter. This f/number does not give large depth of field so only
few subject will be sharp in the image. This is very clear in the image shown
here.
I would like to thank Dr. Abushagur for taking the time to answer this question. Some thing I wanted to note about the image he included here on the left is about its depth of field. If you notice some of the flowers are in focus and others are out of focus. This is a great example of depth of field and how in current camera phones it is limited and creates images similar to this. In future posts I will cover more on this topic.
The 640x480 image is decent for a snapshot. It definitely shows the depth of field limitations, but there is only so much focal length after all.
Posted by: geographer47 | November 06, 2006 at 09:06 AM
Hi, I would like to hear your expert opinion about Omnivision's proposed Wavefront Coding camera lenses. Have you heard anything about this and do you think it will work for camera phones? What are the benefits and drawbacks?
Thank you very much.
Posted by: Babu | November 09, 2006 at 05:48 AM
Nice article. Even such photo dummy like me understood the idea!
Posted by: Alex | September 28, 2007 at 09:48 AM
Is there an effective way to reduce the look of scratches/small cracks on my cell phone camera lens?
Hi,
Last night I accidentally dropped my cell on the ground! When I picked it up, the camera lens area got cracked. It's a thin crack, but it's pretty visible. Do you know of any product I could use to diminish the look?
Posted by: Viagra Online | January 14, 2010 at 10:56 AM
Have you heard anything about this and do you think it will work for camera phones? What are the benefits and drawbacks?
Posted by: cheap viagra | February 19, 2010 at 04:34 PM
The difference is not so big as I thought
Posted by: viagra for women | April 06, 2010 at 09:01 AM
I recommend yo al iphones. They have great cameras!
Posted by: generic cialis from india | April 06, 2010 at 09:08 AM
Even such photo dummy like me understood the idea!
Posted by: Christina | June 01, 2010 at 02:25 PM
Even such photo dummy like me understood the idea!
Posted by: Tılsım | June 23, 2010 at 08:12 AM
Thanks for all the great info! I'm still new to Twitter and this was so helpful! I was wondering how it works when you want to respond to something somebody said.
Posted by: costa rica investments | July 28, 2010 at 04:41 PM
Hi I liked your note, add your site to your bookmarks.
Posted by: RamonGustav | August 25, 2010 at 05:22 AM
I think you are not quite right and you should still studying the matter.
Posted by: RamonGustav | August 25, 2010 at 05:22 AM
Are you eager to secure funds for that dream project of yours?
Posted by: RamonGustav | August 25, 2010 at 05:22 AM
I think you have a thorough understanding in this matter. You describe in detail all here.
Posted by: RamonGustav | August 25, 2010 at 07:32 AM
Congratulations! You have so much useful information, write more.
Posted by: RamonGustav | August 25, 2010 at 07:33 AM
Do you have a viable business but lack the necessary finances to get it off it’s feet?
Posted by: RamonGustav | August 25, 2010 at 07:33 AM
Have you been turned down by other lenders?
Posted by: RamonGustav | August 25, 2010 at 07:41 AM
Are you eager to secure funds for that dream project of yours?
Posted by: RamonGustav | August 25, 2010 at 07:41 AM
Do you have ideas which worth millions but you lack the necessary capital to put your idea to test?
Posted by: RamonGustav | August 25, 2010 at 07:41 AM
Do you desire a house but you lack enough cash to acquire it?
Posted by: Music_master | September 25, 2010 at 09:37 AM
Congratulations! You have so much useful information, write more.
Posted by: Music_master | September 25, 2010 at 09:37 AM
Are you eager to secure funds for that dream project of yours?
Posted by: Music_master | September 25, 2010 at 09:38 AM
To be honest, this article made me understand the genuineness. I understood many things, Related to the topic. I keep on wondering why people keep on wondering so much on the topic. People should start reading your blog in order to get maximum information on the stuff. Things will become more significant after reading your articles. The way these article are full of information and the comments posted show the popularity of your posts.
Posted by: viagra | November 03, 2010 at 06:09 AM
Each person sees things differently, my personal opinion about this article is very good, I think it's very effective, it helped me a lot, was just what I was looking for, I would like to congratulate the creator of this blog, first to have the kindness to share with readers this information.
Posted by: Cheap viagra | November 11, 2010 at 07:00 PM
buy cialis buy cialis at a discount buy cialis brand buy cialis by the pill buy cialis canada buy cialis cheap buy cialis cheaper online buy cialis mexico buy cialis omline buy cialis online 20mg buy cialis online site buy cialis online viagra buy cialis pharmacy buy cialis pills generic
Posted by: RX-order | November 20, 2010 at 05:40 AM